On the Brink with Russia in Syria All over again, 5 Several years Afterwards

Notice to viewers: you should simply click the share buttons above. Forward this write-up to your electronic mail lists. Crosspost on your blog site website, online discussion boards. and so on.

The New York Instances, on September 11, 2013, accommodated Russian President Vladimir V. Putin’s desire “to talk straight to the American people today and their political leaders” about “recent situations surrounding Syria.”

Putin’s op-ed in the Occasions appeared under the title: “A Plea for Caution From Russia.” In it, he warned that a army “strike by the United States from Syria will end result in extra innocent victims and escalation, perhaps spreading the conflict significantly further than Syria’s borders … and unleash a new wave of terrorism. … It could throw the entire technique of international law and order out of harmony.”

Three months in advance of Putin’s piece, on August 21, there experienced been a chemical attack in the Damascus suburb of Ghouta and Syrian President Bashar al-Assad was immediately blamed. There quickly emerged, nevertheless, sufficient proof that the incident was a provocation to bring immediate U.S. military services involvement towards Assad, lest Syrian govt forces retain their momentum and defeat the jihadist rebels.

In a Memorandum for President Barack Obama 5 times ahead of Putin’s report, on September 6, the Veteran Intelligence Industry experts for Sanity (VIPS) had warnedPresident Barack Obama of the likelihood that the incident in Ghouta was a wrong-flag attack.

Regardless of his problem of a U.S. assault, Putin’s major concept in his op-ed was positive, conversing of a developing mutual rely on:

“A new prospect to keep away from military services motion has emerged in the earlier number of times. The United States, Russia and all users of the international neighborhood need to choose benefit of the Syrian government’s willingness to place its chemical arsenal below international management for subsequent destruction. Judging by the statements of President Obama, the United States sees this as an alternative to army motion. [Syria’s chemical weapons were in fact destroyed under UN supervision the following year.]

“I welcome the president’s desire in continuing the dialogue with Russia on Syria. We have to work with each other to keep this hope alive … and steer the dialogue again toward negotiations. If we can keep away from force versus Syria, this will enhance the ambiance in intercontinental affairs and reinforce mutual have faith in … and open the doorway to cooperation on other vital concerns.”

Obama Refuses to Strike

In a lengthy job interview with journalist Jeffrey Goldberg printed in The Atlantic considerably afterwards, in March 2016, Obama confirmed appreciable satisfaction in owning refused to act in accordance to what he known as the “Washington playbook.”

He included a telling vignette that escaped acceptable focus in Establishment media. Obama confided to Goldberg that, through the essential past 7 days of August 2013, Countrywide Intelligence Director James Clapper paid the President an unannounced take a look at to warning him that the allegation that Assad was liable for the chemical attack in Ghouta was “not a slam dunk.”

Clapper’s reference was to the very phrases applied by previous CIA Director George Tenet when he characterised, falsely, the nature of the evidence on WMD in Iraq even though briefing President George W. Bush and Vice President Dick Cheney in December 2002. Added proof that Ghouta was a fake flag came in December 2016 parliamentary testimony in Turkey.

In early September 2013, close to the time of Putin’s op-ed, Obama resisted the tension of practically all his advisers to launch cruise missiles on Syria and accepted the Russian-brokered deal for Syria give up its chemical weapons. Obama abide by community opinion but experienced to endure general public outrage from those lusting for the U.S. to get concerned militarily. From neoconservatives, in distinct, there was hell to pay.

Atop the CNN developing in Washington, DC, on the evening of September 9, two times in advance of Putin’s piece, I experienced a fortuitous up-close-and-private possibility to watch the bitterness and disdain with which Paul Wolfowitz and Joe Lieberman heaped abuse on Obama for staying way too “cowardly” to assault.

Five A long time Later

In his attractiveness for cooperation with the U.S., Putin experienced penned these text reportedly by himself:

“My operating and individual marriage with President Obama is marked by growing rely on. I respect this. I thoroughly analyzed his handle to the nation on Tuesday. And I would instead disagree with a case he made on American exceptionalism, stating that the United States’ coverage is ‘what can make The us various. It’s what tends to make us fantastic.’ It is exceptionally harmful to motivate folks to see them selves as fantastic, regardless of what the motivation. There are huge international locations and small countries, abundant and bad, those with extensive democratic traditions and those still acquiring their way to democracy. Their procedures differ, too. We are all unique, but when we ask for the Lord’s blessings, we have to not overlook that God created us equivalent.”

In new days, President Donald Trump’s nationwide protection adviser, John Bolton, has remaining no question that he is the mascot of American exceptionalism. Its corollary is Washington’s “right” to mail its forces, uninvited, into international locations like Syria.

“We’ve experimented with to express the information in the latest days that if there is a third use of chemical weapons, the response will be a great deal more powerful,” Bolton said on Monday. “I can say we’ve been in consultations with the British and the French who have joined us in the 2nd strike and they also concur that one more use of chemical weapons will end result in a a great deal more powerful reaction.”

As was the situation in September 2013, Syrian govt forces, with Russian guidance, have the rebels on the defensive, this time in Idlib province exactly where most of the remaining jihadists have been driven. On Sunday began what could be the closing showdown of the 5-calendar year war. Bolton’s warning of a chemical assault by Assad will make tiny sense as Damascus is evidently winning and the last factor Assad would do is invite U.S. retaliation.

U.S. Ambassador to the UN, Nikki Haley, with extraordinary prescience, has currently blamed Damascus for no matter what chemical assault may possibly get put. The warnings of immediate U.S. armed forces involvement, increased than Trump’s two prior pin-prick attacks, is an invitation for the cornered jihadists to start a further wrong-flag assault to particularly convey that about.

Sadly, not only has the rising have faith in recorded by Putin five several years ago evaporated, but the likelihood of a U.S.-Russian military clash in the area is as perilously superior as ever.

Seven days prior to Putin’s piece appeared, citizen Donald Trump experienced tweeted:

“Many Syrian ‘rebels’ are radical Jihadis. Not our close friends & supporting them doesn’t serve our national interest. Stay out of Syria!”

In September 2015 Trump accused his Republican major opponents of seeking to “start Planet War III in excess of Syria. Give me a crack. You know, Russia desires to get ISIS, correct? We want to get ISIS. Russia is in Syria — possibly we should let them do it? Enable them do it.”

Past 7 days Trump warned Russian and Syria not to assault Idlib. Trump faces probably his biggest test as president: no matter whether he can resist his neocon advisers and not massively attack Syria, as Obama chose not to, or risk the broader war he accused his Republican opponents of fomenting.


Ray McGovern functions with Inform the Phrase, a publishing arm of the ecumenical Church of the Saviour in interior-metropolis Washington.  He was an Military Infantry/Intelligence officer and then a CIA analyst for a overall of 30 yrs, and was a Presidential briefer from 1981 to 1985.

150115 Long War Cover hi-res finalv2 copy3.jpg

The Globalization of War: America’s “Long War” versus Humanity

Michel Chossudovsky

The “globalization of war” is a hegemonic project. Key armed forces and covert intelligence functions are getting carried out simultaneously in the Center East, Jap Europe, sub-Saharan Africa, Central Asia and the Much East. The U.S. armed service agenda brings together both big theater operations as nicely as covert steps geared toward destabilizing sovereign states.

ISBN Range: 978–9737147-6-
Calendar year: 2015
Internet pages: 240 Web pages

List Price: $22.95

Unique Selling price: $15.00

Simply click right here to buy.

Supply hyperlink

What's Your Reaction?
Cry Cry
Cute Cute
Damn Damn
Dislike Dislike
Lol Lol
Like Like
Love Love
Win Win

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

On the Brink with Russia in Syria All over again, 5 Several years Afterwards

log in

Become a part of our community!

reset password

Back to
log in