A recently noted comment built by former FBI legal professional Lisa Website page throughout her May well testimony to Congress has disclosed a “momentous fact,” according to The Hill‘s John Solomon: immediately after nine months of investigations – which bundled the use of a properly-paid spy to infiltrate the Trump campaign, The FBI experienced no clue whether there was any collusion among Trumpworld and Russia when the scenario was handed over to unique counsel Robert Mueller.
“It is a reflection of us still not figuring out,” Website page informed Rep. John Ratcliffe (R-Texas) when questioned about texts she and Strzok exchanged in May perhaps 2017 as Robert Mueller was staying named a specific prosecutor to consider around the Russia investigation.
With that assertion, Website page acknowledged a momentous point: After 9 months of working with some of the most awesome surveillance powers afforded to U.S. intelligence, the FBI continue to experienced not designed a situation connecting Trump or his marketing campaign to Russia’s election meddling.
Webpage opined more, acknowledging “it continue to existed in the scope of possibility that there would be virtually absolutely nothing” to hook up Trump and Russia, no issue what Mueller or the FBI did. –The Hill
“As significantly as Might of 2017, we even now couldn’t respond to the problem,” mentioned Site at yet another position.
In limited – the FBI’s lead attorney on the Trump-Russia investigation explained the agency had no evidence of Trump-Russia collusion, while special counsel Robert Mueller has however to deliver a shred of evidence either.
As Solomon notes, ex-FBI Director James Comey informed the Senate soon just after he was fired that there was “not however evidence to justify invstigating Trump for colluding with Russia.”
“When I left, we did not have an investigation concentrated on President Trump,” Comey instructed Congressional investigators.
In the meantime, Page’s lover Peter Strzok – who spearheadsed the FBI’s counterintelligence investigation prior to Mueller took more than, texted “there’s no big there, there.”
The Department of Justice (DOJ) inspector standard questioned Strzok soon before he was fired from the FBI what he meant by that textual content, and he supplied a most insightful answer.
Strzok claimed he was not specific there was a “broad, coordinated effort” to hijack the election and that the proof of Trump marketing campaign aides chatting about finding Hillary Clinton dirt from Russians may possibly have been just a “bunch of opportunists” conversing to heighten their great importance.
Strzok extra that, whilst he raised the strategy of impeachment in some of his texts to Web page, “I am, all over again, was not, am not confident or specific that it will,” he informed the IG. –The Hill
In small, James Comey, Peter Strzok and Lisa Website page have all mentioned or implied that the FBI had absolutely nothing linking Trump to Russia. Which, as John Solomon concludes, raises the query: If there was no concrete proof of collusion, why did we want a exclusive prosecutor?
Page’s admission also sugests that the FBI and DOJ officers ended up probable powering a series of leaks to the media just before Mueller’s appointment which made collusion proof glance significantly stronger than investigators understood it to be. It also implies that the MSM – “potentially longing to obtain a new Watergate,” were being “far far too prepared to be manipulated by gamers in a situation that started as a politicial opposition research venture funded by Trump’s Democratic opponent, Hillary Clinton, and led by a former British intelligence agent, Christopher Steele, who despised Trump.”
At what position does Trump basically need Mueller lay his cards on the desk?