As EU negotiators have ongoing to thrust again the deadline for achieving a draft Brexit treaty this week, Theresa May well and her EU counterparts have expressed tentative aid for extending the Brexit transition period, the most recent “compromise” proposal to crop up through the seemingly interminable negotiations. Nonetheless, this proposal is just not a remedy. As 1 BBC editor place it, the proposal for a longer transition is “an extension to an extension which is not a ask for for a longer changeover period but a motivation probably to have the solution” at some point in the potential, assuming the two sides can even agree on a treaty to generate a framework for all those negotiations in the very first location. Of study course, when politicians are going through an intractable challenge, they hardly ever overlook a chance to interact in some preemptive can-kicking.
With the March 29 “Brexit Working day” drawing at any time nearer, and the hazard of a “no-offer” Brexit looming ever larger, several who haven’t been following each headline about the more and more fraught negotiations (and even some who have) are struggling to piece with each other what, specifically, is going on.
Fortuitously, the Automatic Earth has produced a handy chart to enable viewers with this. It’s called “The Brexit Trilemma”. It represents the a few guarantees designed by May’s government that are in direct contradiction with just one a different.
With this in intellect, it seems May possibly has 4 options all whof which are politiclal unteneable.
Solution A: Break guarantee to DUP and erect a border in the Irish Sea.
Possibility B: Split guarantee to Ireland/EU and impose border checks in Eire in violation of the Good Friday agreement.
Selection C: Remain in solitary current market and customs union, violating promises produced to conservative Brexiteers, probable resulting in a leadership problem.
And Solution D: The “unicorn” trade deal – also acknowledged as “magical imagining.”
These conflicts pertain entirely to the so-referred to as Brexit “backstop” settlement, a previous-vacation resort evaluate that would only just take influence if the two sides are unsuccessful to negotiate the final Brexit phrases on customs and trade throughout the changeover. A further conflict has arisen over no matter if the backstop agreement need to be time limited or open up ended, which lately led a person governing administration supply to propose that the backstop “can not be limited by a set date, but could possibly be capable of limitation by reference to a method or a take a look at to build redundancy”.
How will @theresa_could reassure Brexit backstop is short-term? Federal government source: “can’t be limited by a mounted day, but may well be capable of limitation by reference to a system or a check to establish redundancy”. https://t.co/MRvRhDqiIZ
— Robert Peston (@Peston) Oct 16, 2018
Which provoked the next penetrating comment penetrating remark illustrating the extent to which these negotiations have descended into absurdity.
Oh for fuck’s sake. So brexit is now decreased to a lady standing on her head, on the back again of a unicorn, becoming restrained by Ulster Presbyterian flat earthers, in a parallel universe, balancing Fermat’s past theorem on her remaining major toe #clusterfuck
— Alan Kirwin #FBPE (@alankirwin) Oct 16, 2018
Perhaps this is what the EU intended when it chided May well to “get imaginative” in attempting to sq. these opposing interests?